-
priscillamayy liked this
-
marshmellies liked this
-
tweitwei reblogged this from minimalmac
-
everglade reblogged this from minimalmac
-
beyondlimitation reblogged this from minimalmac
-
pablohc liked this
-
ohdearmydear liked this
-
mike3k liked this
-
purns liked this
-
em liked this
-
frijole liked this
-
artlete liked this
-
fuzzmonkey reblogged this from minimalmac
-
usersillusions liked this
-
klugscheissen liked this
-
ikjames reblogged this from minimalmac
-
mike-ambs liked this
-
simondroog liked this
-
jacquesofalltrades liked this
-
jamesaugusta reblogged this from minimalmac
-
realityphotography liked this
-
redcloud liked this
-
mybadmemory liked this
-
demoabi reblogged this from minimalmac
-
demo-abi liked this
-
goombi liked this
-
joyceezee reblogged this from minimalmac
-
parislemon liked this
-
thehipsterhater reblogged this from minimalmac
-
minimalmac posted this
Everyone seems to agree that Apple is very successful, so how are they winning at technology? Maybe it’s because Apple’s technology works so well it makes products by other companies feel hostile towards my intent (even though it is not). Apple’s made a machine that is so refined and polished (literally), that it’s just not even worth investing or waiting for everyone else to catch up. Who wants to finance a company’s awkward adolescence? Apple wins by selling full delivery of a total package, and what consumer would invest their money and time in the unsure potential of something else over that?
—
Frank Chimero in On #winning
(Can’t find the original post on the web. It was here but that link is now broken.)
(Source: minimalmac)